<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: chicago architecture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aperture.shaynaingram.com/2010/01/chicago-architecture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aperture.shaynaingram.com/2010/01/chicago-architecture/</link>
	<description>Images and Commentary from Shayna and Ted</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:51:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Cabeen</title>
		<link>http://aperture.shaynaingram.com/2010/01/chicago-architecture/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Cabeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 06:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aperture.shaynaingram.com/2010/01/chicago-architecture/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Shapes and colors are definitely strong here.  I get a real sense of &quot;city&quot; from this image.  It seems to come out of the pillar.  It&#039;s the sort of design that&#039;s very Chicago, especially against the skyscraper background.  You&#039;d never put a symbol like that on a Santa Barbara building.

Damn it, now I just want to visit Chicago again.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shapes and colors are definitely strong here.  I get a real sense of &#8220;city&#8221; from this image.  It seems to come out of the pillar.  It&#8217;s the sort of design that&#8217;s very Chicago, especially against the skyscraper background.  You&#8217;d never put a symbol like that on a Santa Barbara building.</p>
<p>Damn it, now I just want to visit Chicago again.  :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

